Phrenic Detritus

Retired? Close, but not quite...

2010-05-05T20:11:00.003-04:00

A lot of things have happened in my personal life since my last post. Changes both professionally and personally. I haven't totally disappeared just changed focus' somewhat. As a result this blog has, for the most part fell by the wayside, collected dust, whatever you want to call it.

That's the way that it's going to stay, at least for a while. This blog is just one spoke on the wheel of my online activity. If you're interested in something a bit more regular, you can check out the hub of that activity either at Friendfeed or Facebook. All other spokes, including this one, will feed into there.

Updates here, at least in the immediate future will be infrequent at best. You never know, if something else strikes my fancy that I actually feel like sticking up here in a public place I may just at that.

In the mean time, I thank you for your time and attention, you know how to reach me if you need to.

Trying Something New

2009-02-16T13:24:00.004-05:00

Real Estate Rainmaker: Trying Something New

Don't disregard something new as being impossible to do or a waste of your time.

Keeping it Clean

2009-02-04T15:05:00.005-05:00

Real Estate Rainmaker: Keeping it Clean

Thoughts on correlation between email productivity and a clean inbox.

The Extra Mile, Literally

2009-02-03T10:44:00.001-05:00

Just this past weekend, my wife and I moved. Probably the most disorganized and complicated move for us to date, though through no fault of our own. As everyone knows, the common accepted currency among friends helping friends move is pizza and beer, I wanted to introduce everyone to this great place near by that we had discovered a month or so ago. My purpose was two fold however, as it was also to say good bye to the pizzeria, as in our move, we were no longer in the delivery area.

Since discovering this place, we've been back about once every two weeks, and on a few occasions, several times within a single week. As I was picking up our three extra large pizza's from the owner, I told him that this was for our moving crew, and that we were not outside of his area. He asked where, and then had me come over to their large delivery map on the wall. I showed him where we had moved too, and then realized as I was doing so that we were literally less than a mile from their delivery boundary. So close, yet so far! Maya, the owner then told me that not to worry, I should just call and ask for him and he would make sure that we would get our pizza.

Did he have to? No. Was it that big of a deal? Not really. But, to me, it was huge. He made a small concession on his part, and in doing so engendered even more loyalty in someone who already thought they were the best around.

A lot can be learned from that example, what ways can you go that extra mile for your patrons and customers?

Automatic Searching

2008-12-16T09:40:00.000-05:00

Q - What do the following services have in common? Backtype.com, Blogsearch.Google.com, Search.Twitter.com

A - They all allow updates, either via RSS or email, whenever your particular search term is found.

Between the three of them, you can be notified if someone mentions your name, your company, your competitors, or even your current gadget love interest, be it in a blog entry, comment, or even a tweet. We all have something that we enjoy reading about or knowing about, why not give them a try? Subscribe to their alerts via RSS or email, and let the updates start rolling in.

(note: News.Google.com has RSS feeds for their search terms as well, if you are looking for mainstream news outlets)

Google Reader heart n8x0

2008-12-05T16:44:00.001-05:00

I am happy to say that the new version of GReader works many times better on the Nokia N-Series Browsers. Instead of having to go to a crippled version designed for cell phones, you can use the normal reader. It's a bit sluggish (though that may be the device), but certainly serviceable.

I haven't used it that extensively, but the I was able to get around the various feeds without difficulty. One more app that I use on a regular basis available on the n800. I'm loving it.

GReader - Facelift. But is it Faster?

2008-12-04T16:10:00.001-05:00

Official Google Reader Blog: Square is the new round.

Looks like GReader is getting a facelift. I hope it plays better with the Nokia browsers than the current version. I use Reader all the time at my PC, but am forced to use the mobile version when away beause the MicroB browser on my n800 crawls so bad it's unusuable.

I can't wait to try it out!

TweetDeck: the App That Keeps on Giving

2008-11-26T11:27:00.003-05:00

TweetDeck is a Twitter application that I've been using for quite some time. It's developed and maintained by a one man team: Ian Dodsworth. What initially drew me to the program was the ability to group tweets into different columns. While I do not follow hundreds of people, this feature alone made the program worth using for me. As much as I loved using Twhirl, once I started using TweetDeck I never looked back. Like it's predecessor on my system, it runs on Adobe Air, so it'll run wherever you can install that particular runtime environment.

At the time, what I didn't realize, is how responsive Ian is with his development. Not just to bug fixes and giving help to users who need it, but also in response to feature suggestions and then their implementation. Since I started using the program here are some of the things that he's added:

- A slew of URL shortening services (it seems he adds new ones every release).
- TwitPic and 12Seconds support.
- Built in spell check (YES!).
- Visual and audible tweet notifications.
- International font support.
- Color palette customization.
- Un/Read indication, the ability to clear read tweets.
- Integration with Search.Twitter.com.
- Replies are pulled in via the above, so you can see anyone who has replied to you, regardless of following status.

Going forward, we have to look forward to multi account support, among other things. This is particularly impressive considering that he is a team of ONE.

If you access Twitter on a computer, you are doing yourself a huge disservice by not checking out this program. It has changed the way that I interact with the service, and I know that my usage is relatively light compared to a lot of people out there. Just having a separate column for people I know, verses news or other automatic posting services helps to cut down the signal to noise ratio.

There arn't many programs out there that I endorse 100%, this is one of them.

Check it out at: www.TweetDeck.com.

Slight Adjustment to Layout

2008-11-26T09:56:00.002-05:00

I've gone ahead and updated the template, very simple, single column. As a result ten posts on the main page made the main page way too long, so I've cut it back to just five.

The header image is something that I've been wanting to use for a very long time just never got around to implementing it. Random shot I took in a subway that conveys, to me anyway a lot of depth.

Really Simple Syndication. No, REALLY.

2008-10-23T13:48:00.001-04:00

"Why is it that websites that are good end up bloatware? They put so much stuff on the same page it doesn't load right. IGN's page has gotten really bad, going their page is just cheese." -- E.A.Q.

The above was said by a good friend of mine in a chat last month. My initial response to him was confusion, I really hadn't noticed IGN had changed their page at all. I read their stuff, particularly their reviews quite regularly. Before I switched over to using Chrome, I had Firefox so extensioned up with JS-disabling, Ad-blocking, and page modifying extensions, that at that time it would have been a normal response. Chrome most certainly does not block Javascript or ad's, so what was the problem? How could I miss something that such a problem to my friend?

The answer is simple. I rarely go to the main IGN page. I pull everything in via RSS into Google Reader. When you use something so much and so often, you start to take it for granted that everybody does as well. Think: asking someone for their phone number, expecting a mobile and getting their home phone because they do not have a cell phone. Shocked, you wonder, how can they not have a cell phone?

I wondered the same thing, how can someone who spends time visiting various news sites on an on going basis, get by without RSS? This goes hand in hand with the recent Forrester report on consumer adoption of RSS. This report has been mentioned on various other blogs and news sites following it's release, including various suppositions as to why it's the case. Are you ready for another?

From my experience, people don't use RSS, even after it's been explained to them, because they do not see the point. There are so many out there that would benefit from using a dedicated feed reader, and yet they insist time after time that they can just visit the website. They need to be shown what a great tool it is.

A first hand example of this is my brother-in-law. He works in IT, programs on the side, and visits the standard tech-news sites on an on going basis (Slashdot, Gizmodo, etc, etc), and had Google account. Yet, never opened Reader up once. He just didn't get it. I logged him into Reader, subscribed to the sites that he could remember off the top of his head, and within 5 minutes everything clicked. One place to get all of my news. So much time saved. He couldn't believe that he'd never done it before.

In order for RSS usage (in the sense of consumer's using dedicated readers) to grow, the practical use needs to be demonstrated. People already acclimated to seeing MSNBC pop up as their start page in IE, what if you replaced that with an online feed reader pulling in the content from MSNBC, People, and any other site that visiting. RSS moves from a Huh? to a Can't-Live-Without.

Customer Love

2008-09-15T10:54:00.002-04:00

My wife had been out of town all of last week, so when she got back on Friday, we took the chance to do something we don't do too often: watch a few movies. We went and picked up two of them from the local store, one of which was National Treasure 2. Put it into the DVD player, fired it up, and got treated to eight and a half minutes advertisements.

The best part?

There was no way to skip or fast forward through them. (Even more fun when a pillow fell off the couch an onto the remote, causing the series to reset back to zero after going about a third of the way through).

I don't understand the reasoning behind it. We chose to pay for the movie. We are then forced to watch a preview for Snow White NOW ON BLU-RAY!!!! Followed then by further re-dredges from their vault, now on a brand new format. However, if we would have viewed the movie through an alternative means, we would have watched the movie, and just the movie, and not have been subjected to a bunch of marketing tripe.

Companies whine and whine about how their distribution rights are being infringed upon, and yet, they are the very one's who can't deliver a product that people want to pay for. Is anyone surprised here?

Chrome: Shiny Enough to Make a Difference?

2008-09-10T12:16:00.005-04:00

A recent comic at UserFriendly.org made me smile. It's something that I can totally relate to:
http://ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/?id=20080906

Now that Chrome is little over a week old, I've had some time to use it. It's also been installed at home, and used by the Missus. Her initial thoughts can be summed up by the question that she asked after it had been on our system and set as the default browser for the day: "Did you really get rid of Firefox?" She then followed up with: "I want it back." I later found out that the browser had locked up on her several times, and that's why she wanted it back. Further thoughts from her are as of yet forthcoming.

My usage habits are a bit more complex. At work I use no less than two separate browsers most of the time, and sometimes as often as four due to the many online systems that I access (Firefox, IE, and occasionally Prism and Flock). How does Chrome fit in with all of that?

I've found that I much prefer Chrome's application shortcut feature to be a superior replacement to Prism (application shortcut + m.twitter.com = ROCK). As for just plain browsing (what I've used Flock for), I prefer Chrome as well. So two browsers have just been replaced with Chrome, not too bad!

What about the long term? Speaking personally, I don't think that Chrome will ever totally replace Firefox in my own use. There are just too many extensions that I rely on. For day to day browsing and non specific usage, it does a wonderful job, and is already gaining headway on my own PC here.

All of that aside, the most important aspect of Chrome is the competition that it will give both to Microsoft and Mozilla. Google's in a very good position to market and push a new browser (some may argue that they're in the best position). Competition breeds innovation and therefore a better product, consumers win all around, even those don't switch browsers.

Cutting the Fat

2008-08-15T16:05:00.002-04:00

Verizon's email client on their cell phones is pretty much garbage, so I've abandoned using it altogether. Opting to simply forward my personal email, all of it, to my cell phone's SMS email address. Basically letting the text messaging act as an instant email notification. This had a very unexpected side effect, though. It made me very conscious about what exactly I was getting in my email.

Every email message is now sent to my phone, and I realized just how much garbage I was getting. Things that I really don't care about, that I was always a bit too lazy to opt-out of, but still didn't mind deleting on a regular basis, week after week, or month after month. Not really spam, just solicited advertising that I had been given due to my email address being in some companies database.

It certainly gave me the incentive to take the few seconds to opt out of those emails. Got me thinking, also, as to how many other people do the same thing. Legitimate email advertisements, that they don't even read, but never bother to opt out of, just deleting them over and over ad nauseam.

Convenience vs. Customization

2008-08-07T11:21:00.003-04:00

When given the option, I'll usually choose something (usually an item or program) that will allow me a greater level of customization, rather than something that is easier to use. While initially there may be some more time setting up the highly customizable piece, in the end it's worth it to me to get the usually relativly unique functionality that I'm looking for. Miranda for IM, and an n800 for my portable device of choice.It's too bad that they're not always mutually exclusive. There are plenty of things that are both inconvienant and lack any sort of official customization options, (VZW I'm looking at *YOU*). In some cases, you can always go the unofficial route, but even so, you'll never have the device that fully fits what you're looking for when things are so locked down.

It's too bad that they're not always mutually exclusive. There are plenty of things that are both inconvienant and lack any sort of official customization options, (VZW I'm looking at *YOU*). In some cases, you can always go the unofficial route, but even so, you'll never have the device that fully fits what you're looking for when things are so locked down.

Twitter: You Either Get it or You Don't

2008-02-15T11:21:00.004-05:00

This blog post sums it up very well:

http://www.rexblog.com/2008/02/14/17501/

What's in a Backup?

2007-12-27T12:52:00.002-05:00

If you lost your cell phone right now, how many people would you be able to call? What about your PDA, or computer? If all the magic smoke came out, how long will it take you to be up and running?

Hopefully, all data that cannot be reproduced, such as your priceless photos and home movies, will have a secure backup of your prefered manner. What about the data that is easily gotten but has taken years to accumulate? Often times this will fly right under the radar.

Then again, it's not possible, at least not yet, to backup any and every piece of information. Appropriate selection is necessary.

Whatever you decide don't be the one to ask the question: "Backup, what backup?"

Relearning a Skill

2007-12-12T11:16:00.001-05:00

About four years ago, I read about the Dvorak Simplified Keyboard layout. Always one to try out new things, I switched my layout over, and gave it a try. I tried to learn how to retype using a different keyboard layout.

Frustrating is one word that would aptly describe that experience. Since I do most of my typing while at work, I had that computer switched over. I would switch back to Qwerty when my slow typing would frustrate me. It lasted about a week before I just gave it up.

Fast forward about a year or two, and I'm reading on Slashdot, and come across some comments about how people have switched over to Dvorak, and the reasons why. While the verdict is still out on if Dvorak actually improves typing speed, one thing that it does is reduce the stress that on your hands and wrist typing causes. Working in IT and spending at least forty hours a week in front of a keyboard, this is very important for me.

All of a sudden, I had a reason to give it a try again, and so I did. There was no switching back and forth this time. I completely removed the Qwerty layout from my system. It was slow, and frustrating, oh, and did I also mention frustrating? Typing, like a lot of things that you do physically, is something that once learned becomes a muscle memory. It's something that you can do automatically, unconsciously, anyone who can touch type will tell you. All of that was wrong all of a sudden.

The only two keys that are shared between the alphabet between the layouts are the letters A and M. Everything else is different. I felt like I was a three year old pounding on the keyboard. The letters that my brain wanted to appear were coming out all wrong.

As hard as that was though, even more difficult was relearning keyboard shortcuts. Copy, cut, and paste for instance. Even though, mentally you know it's a Ctrl-C, your fingers automatically go for the proper keys. Well, C, X, and V get moved. They're still C, X, and V, only their positions are I, B and the Period keys. Relearning the new physical locations of these and other keyboard shortcuts was probably the most difficult thing for me.

It took me about two months (a seemingly very long two months) to get to where I was comfortable with Dvorak, and perhaps another two or three to get to where I was before, speed wise, in Qwerty. I honestly can't say if it's faster or not. One thing that I know for sure is that my typos have drastically decreased. My typing accuracy is greatly improved as a result of learning the new layout. I've also never had any problems with RSI despite my constant keyboard use (though, since I never had any RSI problems before the switch, I can't tell if changing made a difference in that regard).

Dvorak is not for everyone primarily because it's not something that can be learned over night. It's more than just leaning a new style of typing since you have to unlearn the old. I, though, feel that the change was well worth the time investment.

Blog-smchlog! I'm Too Busy to Blog

2007-12-07T14:33:00.002-05:00

Too busy to blog? Count your keystrokes. « Jon Udell Annotated

Was the email message you wrote to three people possibly of use to thirty, or three hundred, or thirty thousand? If so, consider blogging it — externally if that’s appropriate, or internally otherwise. Then, if you want to make sure those three people see the message, go ahead and email them a pointer to it.

This is a very good article, especially for people who feel that they are too busy to blog, or even that there is very little business sense in doing so. All too often do I see people write some great peace of marketing advice and send it off to a client. Then a few days later, they are looking for it in their email so that it can be copied and pasted, and then sent right out again.

Getting your name or your companies name out there, especially in relation to your specific field, is never a bad thing. Why not practice keystroke conservation?

This is the NEWS

2007-12-04T13:18:00.000-05:00

I was talking with my wife yesterday, and she mentioned that she had turned on the news to just catch up as to what was happening in the world. She turned it off when all that was being shown was non-stop coverage of the funeral of a young athlete that was killed last week (it's always sad when someone dies, but especially at such a young age).

That was the news, that was all of the news. Despite the fact that it was a very tragic and local event, it highlighted the very reason that I have not watched the news in a very long time: You will be informed of what they want to inform you about, and you will like it.

One has no control over what they see. You get the commercials, and stories are drawn out. Either a little bit of everything is covered, or in the example above, one thing is covered very well, but nothing else. Certain news stories that may be of interest will be teased at but not actually covered until well into the broadcast (no doubt trying to hold the audience for as long as possible). Obviously there is a better way. It's no wonder that the industry can hear their own death tolls. The general trend over from hard hitting to newsertainment is a clear indication of this.

A side note: I knew things had gotten bad when the local channel here had a section called "cyber-corner" where they basically read word for word headlines that were posted online earlier that day. I don't want to hear what a website reported on from the newscaster on TV, what do you think Digg is for? No thanks.

Personally, I'll stick to my radio (during the commute into work), and various RSS feeds. I get the news, both in quality and in quantity, the way that I want to.

Implementation of Disqus

2007-12-04T11:31:00.000-05:00

I just set it up to run here, we'll see how it works. Looks like it could be a very useful alternative to the default commenting on Blogger.

Time is Limited

2007-11-29T14:29:00.000-05:00

When someone would ask me, "What do you like to do in your free time?" I used to respond with "Free time, what's that?" I don't say that any more.

Time is something that we all have a limited amount of it, and no matter what, you can never, ever, make more of it. That being true, what you can do is make the best use of the time that you do have. Something that I have recently become quite adept at.

It's about your definition of free time, and what you expect to get out of it. Free time, or recreation, should refresh you, recharge your batteries. While having too much can be exhausting, not having any at all will run you dry. My definition of free time used to be very narrow, defined simply as being at home, with no other responsibilities. Time I could use to do anything I want with. This is also why I didn't have any "free time" as I would have called it.

Further examination found that while I did not have what fit my narrow definition, I had quite a bit of unclaimed down time. An hour commute into the office and then an hour again in leaving the office. Bits and pieces of time spent waiting in the car for people, ten minutes here, a half hour there. It all adds up, and I learned how to use that down time to get things that I wanted to accomplish done.

Free time. My definition expanded, and I have it again.

Consolidation and Configuration

2007-11-29T12:06:00.000-05:00

Removed the other defunct blogs I had on here. I'll be working on this one specifically. Going to try to be a bit more diligent about using it.

Next up, I'll be trying to find a better template, and fleshing out my profile a bit more.